This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

It's true that AI is upending how students manage academic writing. But I don't think essays are becoming less relevant. If anything, I think they are becoming more relevant. To see why, forget about AI for a second and ask a simpler question.

What are essays even still doing in higher education?

Okay. Brace yourself. Ready?

Most students think essay writing is about responding to a question set by your lecturer. It's a test, right? An exercise in showing how well you're doing.

Wrong. Big mistake.

That's not why you write essays. Long-form academic essays are not tests. They are engines. Intellectual engines. And that is exactly why they're still used. Let me explain.

What an Essay Actually Is

An academic essay is a structured attempt to answer a complex intellectual problem under constraint. Let's unpack that, because it does sound like a lot of academic waffle.

It's structured. It has an architecture. It isn't a random stream of thoughts.

It's an attempt. It's provisional. You're not delivering truth. You're constructing a defensible position.

It tackles a complex problem. Good essay questions don't have obvious answers.

It's all done under constraint. Word limits. Evidence limits. Time limits.

An essay, approached properly, forces you to decide what matters and what doesn't, to take a position instead of hiding behind a summary, to organise competing ideas and justify your reasoning with evidence, and to anticipate the challenges a reader might throw back.

That process is cognitively demanding in a way short-form testing is not. The essay isn't checking whether you've consumed information. It's checking whether you can do something with it. And that demand doesn't just come from deep reflection on what you've read. It comes from the sheer avalanche of skills you have to use, and develop, while you're trying to write the thing.

Why students get overwhelmed by essays

Essay writing doesn't involve just one or two skills. It's a whole stack of them, working at once.

You have to research, which means trawling through databases, skimming abstracts, deciding what's worth reading properly and what isn't. You have to absorb and challenge what you've read, which is a completely different cognitive gear from finding it in the first place. Then you have to organise your sources so you can actually find them again when you need them, instead of spending two hours at midnight shouting "where did I even see that quote?!" while your flatmates try to figure out whether to make you a calming cup of chamomile tea or call home to see if you missed your prescription.

Then you have to plan an argument. Then you have to write it, which is a different skill again, because crafting clear, persuasive prose has almost nothing in common with the reading and thinking that got you there. Then you have to edit it, which means switching from creator to critic and reading your own work as if someone else wrote it, which is terrifying. Then you have to format, reference and proofread, all of which is tedious but will cost you marks if you get it wrong.

Research. Critical thinking. Information management. Argument construction. Communication. Editing. Project management. You're expected to do all of these, often for the first time at this level, in a single piece of work. And the hat-switching is relentless. The part of your brain that combs through journal articles is not the same part that writes a compelling opening paragraph. The skills you need for editing are almost the opposite of the skills you need for drafting.

That's why essays feel so hard. Not because you're not smart enough. Because nobody frames the sheer complexity of what you're being asked to do.

The Struggle Is the Point

All of that complexity? That relentless hat-switching? That feeling of being pulled in six directions by a single assignment? That's the point.

Essays are weightlifting for the brain. Every time you struggle through the mess of researching, organising, arguing, writing, editing and referencing, you're building cognitive muscle. Not just learning about your subject, but training yourself to think, decide, communicate and manage complexity under pressure. Not regurgitation. Not elegant paraphrasing. Not decorative referencing. Judgement.

That's why essays persist. Not because universities are nostalgic. Because few other assessment formats develop so many skills at once.

Which brings us back to AI. If essays were just about producing text, then yes, AI would make them pointless. But essays were never about the text. They were about the thinking that produces the text. The decisions, the trade-offs, the judgement calls you make along the way. AI can generate words. It cannot do your thinking for you. And if you let it, you're skipping the exact thing the essay was designed to build.

So no, essays are not going anywhere. And the students who understand what essays are actually for, not a test of knowledge but an engine for developing judgement, are the ones who'll thrive. Whether AI is in the picture or not.

If this made you rethink how you approach your next essay, forward it to a friend who's still writing 2,000 words of summary and wondering why they got a D.

Hey there!

You’re reading WeGoGeek — a weekly newsletter about how university actually works. Each issue breaks down the hidden curriculum of higher education: essays, feedback, seminars, imposter syndrome, procrastination, and the avalanche of unwritten rules that shape who thrives and who struggles at uni.

— Petros

Recommended for you